<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Incessant Expressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iloveteh.biz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iloveteh.biz</link>
	<description>Writing for writing's sake</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smash Lab sucks hard, VP of Discovery apparently agrees by James Westfall</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/smash-lab-sucks-hard-vp-of-discovery-apparently-agrees/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>James Westfall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/smash-lab-sucks-hard-vp-of-discovery-apparently-agrees/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>@Bill

Judging by the fact that they renewed the show for another season despite the fact that &lt;em&gt;a lot&lt;/em&gt; of devoted Discovery Channel watchers complained endlessly lets us know that Discovery doesn't really care.  They saved a show that was failed from the start, and only focuses on explosions and "solving" mundane problems.  What have they ever &lt;strong&gt;ever&lt;/strong&gt; really solved that was both a poignant problem and a viable one?  In the entire first season, that answer is nothing.  This season?  Fairly sure it's nothing so far.

Something like Project Discovery Earth is so much better and more inviting because it's focusing on real problems with viable, if oddball, solutions.  Figuring out how to keep a semi from tipping its load of logs while barreling around a turn isn't a problem (this week's episode).  There's a solution: braking.  I just saved myself from wasting an hour of my night watching their dumb experiments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill</p>
<p>Judging by the fact that they renewed the show for another season despite the fact that <em>a lot</em> of devoted Discovery Channel watchers complained endlessly lets us know that Discovery doesn&#8217;t really care.  They saved a show that was failed from the start, and only focuses on explosions and &#8220;solving&#8221; mundane problems.  What have they ever <strong>ever</strong> really solved that was both a poignant problem and a viable one?  In the entire first season, that answer is nothing.  This season?  Fairly sure it&#8217;s nothing so far.</p>
<p>Something like Project Discovery Earth is so much better and more inviting because it&#8217;s focusing on real problems with viable, if oddball, solutions.  Figuring out how to keep a semi from tipping its load of logs while barreling around a turn isn&#8217;t a problem (this week&#8217;s episode).  There&#8217;s a solution: braking.  I just saved myself from wasting an hour of my night watching their dumb experiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smash Lab sucks hard, VP of Discovery apparently agrees by Bill</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/smash-lab-sucks-hard-vp-of-discovery-apparently-agrees/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/smash-lab-sucks-hard-vp-of-discovery-apparently-agrees/#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Smash Lab is the Stupidest show on tv. They actually think the problems are worth solving...give me a break! SMASH LAB IS FUCKING STUPID</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smash Lab is the Stupidest show on tv. They actually think the problems are worth solving&#8230;give me a break! SMASH LAB IS FUCKING STUPID</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New milk jug design causes furor by James Westfall</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/new-milk-jug-design-causes-furor/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>James Westfall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/?p=322#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>Try reading the entire post next time, I in fact *did* mention stacking.  However, please make sure to do your own research.  Part of the new design is in fact to use less plastic to make it lighter.  Why?  Lighter jugs weigh less...to cut down on fuel costs.  This jug was specifically designed to use less plastic to cut down on both fuel costs in shipping and the use of petroleum to save money, it's not just about stacking as you propose.

I did my research, did you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try reading the entire post next time, I in fact *did* mention stacking.  However, please make sure to do your own research.  Part of the new design is in fact to use less plastic to make it lighter.  Why?  Lighter jugs weigh less&#8230;to cut down on fuel costs.  This jug was specifically designed to use less plastic to cut down on both fuel costs in shipping and the use of petroleum to save money, it&#8217;s not just about stacking as you propose.</p>
<p>I did my research, did you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New milk jug design causes furor by Mojo</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/new-milk-jug-design-causes-furor/#comment-1523</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/?p=322#comment-1523</guid>
		<description>Do some research before you write an article like this.  Your explanation for why the industry redesigned the milk jug is incorrect.  It's not because the plastic is "lighter" or to "cut down" on plastic use.  It's because the new squarer design can be packed, stacked, and shipped more efficiently, which in turn saves money on shipping.  It can also be stacked easier in warehouse stores (Costco, Sams) without using crates, which again saves money and space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do some research before you write an article like this.  Your explanation for why the industry redesigned the milk jug is incorrect.  It&#8217;s not because the plastic is &#8220;lighter&#8221; or to &#8220;cut down&#8221; on plastic use.  It&#8217;s because the new squarer design can be packed, stacked, and shipped more efficiently, which in turn saves money on shipping.  It can also be stacked easier in warehouse stores (Costco, Sams) without using crates, which again saves money and space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oh boy, I thought class was going to suck by Liam</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/oh-boy-i-thought-class-was-going-to-suck/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/?p=381#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>"We haven’t touched The God Delusion yet, haven’t read any nonsense from Behe..."
Ah! The quintessentially open mind of the 7th grader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We haven’t touched The God Delusion yet, haven’t read any nonsense from Behe&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Ah! The quintessentially open mind of the 7th grader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who were the Kenites? by alan joseph</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>alan joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>Hello.   The eighth character of the Hebrew Alephbet is Cheth, representing the second "H," and included in the term Nachash as an extension of Nahash, "Whisperer."   The king Achash that David became attached to as a mercenary was of the Serpent Cult, and David inscribed his credentials of that cult upon the gatepost of the city for the eyes of Achish alone.   In feigning madness, he allowed spittle to run down his beard like the venom of a serpent to show he was of the Nachashon sect that carried out assassinations of cult members who strayed from the straight and narrow.    In knowing that it is no surprise that his father Jessie/Ishi-iahu ("Man of Yahweh") was also a Nahshon ("Whisperer").    Levi means "Coiler," a kind of Garland that encircled the Levite priesthood as its spiritual and military arm.   As you can imagine the Leviathan, or "Strong Coiler," could not be a whale as it is unable to coil itself about anything and therefore was a Sea Serpent mirroring that Serpent in the sky known as Serpens.    If you would like to peruse a treatise on the Serpent Cult, of which Samuel was also a member, please email and it shall  be sent.    There is also another and much longer work on the Kenanite/Kenite saga that may aid in your research.    If possible some form of collaberation might be arranged in presenting a fuller picture of who the Kenites were and what they did for the Jews before and after the conquest of Canaan.  One hero, called Caleb, was given Hebron as an everlasting homeland for his fathers descendants and proving that the Kenites were held in high esteem.   But when you are made aware that the three cohorts of Abraham in Hebron/Mamre were in fact Kenites and not Amorites, as given, a whole new aspect of the surface storyline is shown in the esoteric subtext.
The very warmest of regards.   Alan Joseph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.   The eighth character of the Hebrew Alephbet is Cheth, representing the second &#8220;H,&#8221; and included in the term Nachash as an extension of Nahash, &#8220;Whisperer.&#8221;   The king Achash that David became attached to as a mercenary was of the Serpent Cult, and David inscribed his credentials of that cult upon the gatepost of the city for the eyes of Achish alone.   In feigning madness, he allowed spittle to run down his beard like the venom of a serpent to show he was of the Nachashon sect that carried out assassinations of cult members who strayed from the straight and narrow.    In knowing that it is no surprise that his father Jessie/Ishi-iahu (&#8221;Man of Yahweh&#8221;) was also a Nahshon (&#8221;Whisperer&#8221;).    Levi means &#8220;Coiler,&#8221; a kind of Garland that encircled the Levite priesthood as its spiritual and military arm.   As you can imagine the Leviathan, or &#8220;Strong Coiler,&#8221; could not be a whale as it is unable to coil itself about anything and therefore was a Sea Serpent mirroring that Serpent in the sky known as Serpens.    If you would like to peruse a treatise on the Serpent Cult, of which Samuel was also a member, please email and it shall  be sent.    There is also another and much longer work on the Kenanite/Kenite saga that may aid in your research.    If possible some form of collaberation might be arranged in presenting a fuller picture of who the Kenites were and what they did for the Jews before and after the conquest of Canaan.  One hero, called Caleb, was given Hebron as an everlasting homeland for his fathers descendants and proving that the Kenites were held in high esteem.   But when you are made aware that the three cohorts of Abraham in Hebron/Mamre were in fact Kenites and not Amorites, as given, a whole new aspect of the surface storyline is shown in the esoteric subtext.<br />
The very warmest of regards.   Alan Joseph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who were the Kenites? by James Westfall</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>James Westfall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>Wow, just wow.  Absolutely nothing you said makes sense.  A black woman has a child by a white man and then conceives non-identical twins by a black man and they won't look the same?  That makes absolutely no sense at all.  Of course having children from &lt;strong&gt;two different fathers&lt;/strong&gt; will produce children that look different.  It's called "genetics".  I guess the fact that Arnold Murray is a fairly outspoken racist would have no effect on your inane babbling.

Funny, I &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; go to Strongs for the proper translation of words from the story of the Kenites and unspectacularly, I got a different story than you did.  I'm not amazed because I'm not believing dogma that's spoon-fed to me, I did the research.

You're right, everyone needs to go back to the original Hebrew texts (which don't exist) and translate into archaic Hebrew (which almost no one outside of Judaic academia can) to provide a true translation.  The word 'snake' was not a bad translation, it was the proper one based on the times but nowhere does it state in the Old Testament that it's an allusion to Lucifer, this is only stated in the New Testament.  You know, the part of the Bible Christians say completely negates what came before it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, just wow.  Absolutely nothing you said makes sense.  A black woman has a child by a white man and then conceives non-identical twins by a black man and they won&#8217;t look the same?  That makes absolutely no sense at all.  Of course having children from <strong>two different fathers</strong> will produce children that look different.  It&#8217;s called &#8220;genetics&#8221;.  I guess the fact that Arnold Murray is a fairly outspoken racist would have no effect on your inane babbling.</p>
<p>Funny, I <em>did</em> go to Strongs for the proper translation of words from the story of the Kenites and unspectacularly, I got a different story than you did.  I&#8217;m not amazed because I&#8217;m not believing dogma that&#8217;s spoon-fed to me, I did the research.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, everyone needs to go back to the original Hebrew texts (which don&#8217;t exist) and translate into archaic Hebrew (which almost no one outside of Judaic academia can) to provide a true translation.  The word &#8217;snake&#8217; was not a bad translation, it was the proper one based on the times but nowhere does it state in the Old Testament that it&#8217;s an allusion to Lucifer, this is only stated in the New Testament.  You know, the part of the Bible Christians say completely negates what came before it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who were the Kenites? by MICHAEL FLANAGAN</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>MICHAEL FLANAGAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>just so everybody knows the true meaning of the word nachash in hebrew is to hiss ie to whisper to enchant to deceive .now we know who deceives so he is lucifer he has many names but he is the same old dragon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just so everybody knows the true meaning of the word nachash in hebrew is to hiss ie to whisper to enchant to deceive .now we know who deceives so he is lucifer he has many names but he is the same old dragon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who were the Kenites? by MICHAEL FLANAGAN</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>MICHAEL FLANAGAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/who-were-the-kenites/#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>I REALLY FIND IT VERY DISTURBING THAT MOST OF THE CHRISTIAN WORLD TREATS ARNOLD MURRAY WITH SUCH DISTAIN,HAVE U NOT READ HAVE U NOT SPENT ANY TIME IN RESEARCH COME ON I HAVE YOUNG CHILDREN THAT CAN SEE WHAT HE IS SAYING.NACHSEH DOES NOT MEAN SERPENT IN HEBREW READ YOUR STRONGS CON CORDANCE PLEASE PROPERLY TRANSLATED IT MEANS THE BRIGHT AND SHINING GLORIOUS ANGEL OF LIGHT AND IF U R ANY KIND OF BIBLE SCHOLAR U WILL SEE THAT THIS IS A REFERENCE TO LUCIFER THE WORD SNAKE WAS AND IS ABAD TRANSLATION IF U WANT TRUTH U MUST GO BACK TO THE ORIGANAL TEXT WITTEN IN HEBREW NOT TODAYS HEBREW BUT THAT THAT WAS SPOKEN AT THE TIME OF MOSES WHICH TODAY IS A DEAD LANGUAGE THAT MEANING THAT EVERY MEANING OF EVERY WOSD IS FIXED SO THAT IT CAN NOT BE CHANGE IT MEANS WHAT IT MEANS                                                                                                                      JUST SO U KNOW IF THE FALLEN ANGELS OF GEN 6 COULD LEAVE THEIR FIRST HABITATION AND TAKE THE DAUGHTERS OF ADAM FOR WIVIES AND THEN CONCEIVE CHILREN WITH THEM CALLED IN HEBREW GEBER OR MIGHTY MEN IE THE GAINTS OF GEN 6,THEN WHY COULD NOT LUCIFER NOT DO THE SAME WITH EVE HE IS THE ULTIMATE FALLEN ANGEL UMUST LOOK PAST THE DOG MA OF CONVENTIAL THINKING IT IS WHAT IT IS THERE ARE NO SECRETS WITH GOD HIS BIVLE ANSWERS ALL QUESTIONS IF PROPERLY TRANSLATED                                                                                                                   REMEMBER THAT LUCIFER ISTHE CHEIF CAPTAIN OF THESE FALLEN ANGELSTHEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT LUCIFER COULD DO AND BEING OF THE HEAVENLYS THEY WOULD HAVE SIMILAR POWER AS HIM ,MAYBE NOT AS POWERFUL AS HIM .REMEMBER SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT THAT UNTIL HIS FALL HE WAS THE COVER CHERBUM ,HE WAS AN ARCH ANGEL JUST LIKE MICHAEL LUCIFER ON THE LEFT MICHAEL ONTHE RIGHT HAVE U NOT READ EZK 28                                          
                                        ARNOLD MURRAY IS NOT WRONG JUST ASK A MEDICAL DOCTOR IF A BLACK WOMAN CAN SLEEP WITH AWHITE MAN CONCEIVE WITH THIS MAN THEN SLEEP WITH ABLACK MAN AND ALSO CONCEIVE WITH HIM AND PRODUCE TWINS THAT ARE NON IDENTICAL BUT ARE OF TWO DIFFERENT FATHERS DO I NEED TO SAY MORE THIS APPLES TO ANY RACE OF PEOPLE U MUST LOOKAT THIS IN THE PROPER CONTEXT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I REALLY FIND IT VERY DISTURBING THAT MOST OF THE CHRISTIAN WORLD TREATS ARNOLD MURRAY WITH SUCH DISTAIN,HAVE U NOT READ HAVE U NOT SPENT ANY TIME IN RESEARCH COME ON I HAVE YOUNG CHILDREN THAT CAN SEE WHAT HE IS SAYING.NACHSEH DOES NOT MEAN SERPENT IN HEBREW READ YOUR STRONGS CON CORDANCE PLEASE PROPERLY TRANSLATED IT MEANS THE BRIGHT AND SHINING GLORIOUS ANGEL OF LIGHT AND IF U R ANY KIND OF BIBLE SCHOLAR U WILL SEE THAT THIS IS A REFERENCE TO LUCIFER THE WORD SNAKE WAS AND IS ABAD TRANSLATION IF U WANT TRUTH U MUST GO BACK TO THE ORIGANAL TEXT WITTEN IN HEBREW NOT TODAYS HEBREW BUT THAT THAT WAS SPOKEN AT THE TIME OF MOSES WHICH TODAY IS A DEAD LANGUAGE THAT MEANING THAT EVERY MEANING OF EVERY WOSD IS FIXED SO THAT IT CAN NOT BE CHANGE IT MEANS WHAT IT MEANS                                                                                                                      JUST SO U KNOW IF THE FALLEN ANGELS OF GEN 6 COULD LEAVE THEIR FIRST HABITATION AND TAKE THE DAUGHTERS OF ADAM FOR WIVIES AND THEN CONCEIVE CHILREN WITH THEM CALLED IN HEBREW GEBER OR MIGHTY MEN IE THE GAINTS OF GEN 6,THEN WHY COULD NOT LUCIFER NOT DO THE SAME WITH EVE HE IS THE ULTIMATE FALLEN ANGEL UMUST LOOK PAST THE DOG MA OF CONVENTIAL THINKING IT IS WHAT IT IS THERE ARE NO SECRETS WITH GOD HIS BIVLE ANSWERS ALL QUESTIONS IF PROPERLY TRANSLATED                                                                                                                   REMEMBER THAT LUCIFER ISTHE CHEIF CAPTAIN OF THESE FALLEN ANGELSTHEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT LUCIFER COULD DO AND BEING OF THE HEAVENLYS THEY WOULD HAVE SIMILAR POWER AS HIM ,MAYBE NOT AS POWERFUL AS HIM .REMEMBER SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT THAT UNTIL HIS FALL HE WAS THE COVER CHERBUM ,HE WAS AN ARCH ANGEL JUST LIKE MICHAEL LUCIFER ON THE LEFT MICHAEL ONTHE RIGHT HAVE U NOT READ EZK 28<br />
                                        ARNOLD MURRAY IS NOT WRONG JUST ASK A MEDICAL DOCTOR IF A BLACK WOMAN CAN SLEEP WITH AWHITE MAN CONCEIVE WITH THIS MAN THEN SLEEP WITH ABLACK MAN AND ALSO CONCEIVE WITH HIM AND PRODUCE TWINS THAT ARE NON IDENTICAL BUT ARE OF TWO DIFFERENT FATHERS DO I NEED TO SAY MORE THIS APPLES TO ANY RACE OF PEOPLE U MUST LOOKAT THIS IN THE PROPER CONTEXT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some helpful and not so helpful &#8216;hacks&#8217; on saving electricity by Solar</title>
		<link>http://iloveteh.biz/some-helpful-and-not-so-helpful-hacks-on-saving-electricity/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iloveteh.biz/?p=375#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>Yes! Keeping in mind the drastic environmental changes and rising fuel prices going Solar is one option open to all at minimal investments. The Solar Water heating systems are so easy to install and most of them come in a Do-it Yourself kit, With the technological advancement the once heavy, bulky hard to move panels are now available widely in light weight easy to carry by one personal only packages. The advancement in technology is not only limited to light weight, but for those concern about the asthetics of the panels, the good news is that the panels are now available with a variety of teim colors to choose from and can be easily matched to your roof. Saving about $25.oo on ones electricity bill on a residence of 4. We all use hot water, as one of our basic needs and what can be a better way, than helping our environment, saving our resources and ourself's some money other than by investing in a Solar Water Heating System.
There are a couple useful websites I'm aware off, that I would like to share with you
1. www.dsireusa.org- is a comprehensive source of information on state, local 
, utility ans federal incentives that promote renewable engery ans energy efficieny.
2. www.powerpartnerssolar.com- one of the many manufacturers of certified Solar Water Heating Systems available. One place I saw the light weight panels and trim color options I was mentioning earlier. 
Lastly, the local utilites in some areas also provide additional rebates and incentives for adding a Solar Water Heating Sytem to your exisitng water tank.
Keep the look out on. Feel Good and save- money for you, environment for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! Keeping in mind the drastic environmental changes and rising fuel prices going Solar is one option open to all at minimal investments. The Solar Water heating systems are so easy to install and most of them come in a Do-it Yourself kit, With the technological advancement the once heavy, bulky hard to move panels are now available widely in light weight easy to carry by one personal only packages. The advancement in technology is not only limited to light weight, but for those concern about the asthetics of the panels, the good news is that the panels are now available with a variety of teim colors to choose from and can be easily matched to your roof. Saving about $25.oo on ones electricity bill on a residence of 4. We all use hot water, as one of our basic needs and what can be a better way, than helping our environment, saving our resources and ourself&#8217;s some money other than by investing in a Solar Water Heating System.<br />
There are a couple useful websites I&#8217;m aware off, that I would like to share with you<br />
1. <a href="http://www.dsireusa.org-" rel="nofollow">http://www.dsireusa.org-</a> is a comprehensive source of information on state, local<br />
, utility ans federal incentives that promote renewable engery ans energy efficieny.<br />
2. <a href="http://www.powerpartnerssolar.com-" rel="nofollow">http://www.powerpartnerssolar.com-</a> one of the many manufacturers of certified Solar Water Heating Systems available. One place I saw the light weight panels and trim color options I was mentioning earlier.<br />
Lastly, the local utilites in some areas also provide additional rebates and incentives for adding a Solar Water Heating Sytem to your exisitng water tank.<br />
Keep the look out on. Feel Good and save- money for you, environment for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
